A Way to Repair the Past

These days, the judgment of history saturates our public discourse. We battle over the meaning of Confederate statues; we discuss reparations for slavery; even the “#MeToo” movement brings the transgressions of the past into the present. Unfortunately, all this division is breaking the nation apart.

In North Carolina, there is a way to address the past in a positive way. It is by pardoning a governor who, during Reconstruction, put down an uprising of the Ku Klux Klan—and was impeached for it. Strangely enough, in spite of all the chatter these days about atoning for the sins of the past, obtaining a posthumous pardon for the governor has been impossible so far.

Governor William Woods Holden, impeached in 1871.

I know this because Arch T. Allen, a retired attorney in Raleigh, conducted an extensive study of Holden in 2010 and petitioned the North Carolina state legislature to pardon him. Allen’s paper was reviewed by several prominent historians in the state, so it is accurate.[1] Here is the story.

In 1868, William W. Holden was elected governor of North Carolina. “There had been little Klan activity in the state prior to the 1868 elections,” writes Allen, “but after the Republican victories violence erupted in several parts of the state. . . . The Klan committed arson, lynching, and political assassination, including one of a white Republic sheriff by ambush.” A black Republican, Wyatt Outlaw, was dragged from his home and hanged; four Klan members killed Republican senator John W. Stephens by cutting his throat and stabbing him in the heart. Several children were killed.

“Beseeched by white and black Republicans to protect them from Klan violence, Holden acted pursuant to constitutional and statutory authority to execute the law and suppress riots and insurrections,” writes Allen. He declared Alamance and Caswell [counties] in insurrection and dispatched the state militia there.” The militia arrested about 100 Klan members and stopped the violence.

Conflict soon arose over detention of the Klan members without a writ of habeas corpus. The chief justice of North Carolina ordered Holden to turn the dissidents over to local authorities; but Holden said that because they had not kept order he could not hand them over now. “It would be mockery in me to declare that the civil authority was unable to protect the citizens against the insurgents [the Klansmen] and then turn the insurgents over to the civil authority,” he said.

However, when a federal district court judge required that the prisoners be released, Holden did so. Ironically, the federal judge acted in the name of the post-Civil War fourteenth amendment, which was meant to protect the blacks freed by the war.

Then, in 1871, the North Carolina House impeached Holden.

As Allen observes, “Although he received no official vindication, Holden has been vindicated by modern historians, especially his biographers Horace W. Raper and William C. Harris.” But not by the North Carolina legislature, except in part. In 2011, as the North Carolina legislature met for nostalgic reasons in the Old State Capitol (used until 1963). In somewhat of a surprise action, the Senate voted 48-0 to pardon Holden.

But the House (the body that had impeached Holden in the first place) has yet to act. The pardon simply never came up for a vote. And this is despite the fact that three past governors (two of them Republicans, one a Democrat) wrote a letter supporting the pardon.

Why? Some people, especially in the Alamance and Caswell counties where the insurrection was put down, may have had more sympathy for Ku Klux Klan members of the past than for redress of the harms they did. But Republicans are in the majority in North Carolina’s House, Holden was a Republican, and he was clearly addressing horrendous violence, so why did the Republican-majority House fail to act?

I know enough about politics to know that political leaders have only so much political capital, and each has priorities. To persuade a few recalcitrant Republicans, possibly those from the affected counties, might diminish the stock of political capital that can be used for some purpose that in their minds is more urgent.

I have asked the key people in the House—the chairman of the committee to which the bill was submitted and the speaker of the House, now a U.S. senator—for explanations. I await them.

Meanwhile, I wonder if perhaps, in the era of mea culpa, it will be the Democrats who take up this challenge. After all, it was Democrats (then known as Democratic-Conservatives) who impeached Governor Holden. How honorable it would be if they would look back, regret the actions of their political forbears, and carry out the pardon that the Republicans failed to complete.

[1] Arch T. Allen III, “A Plea for Pardon: The Impeachment and Removal of North Carolina’s Republican Reconstruction Governor.” (Available upon request.)

One Reply to “A Way to Repair the Past”

Fine essay, Jane. The past is always with us. Best. Bill Dennis

Explore More History

News about History and Historians

Hornwinked? History Facts tells us that Vikings didn’t wear horned helmets, and explains why we think so.

Isaac Willour reviews a new book about an important but little-known abolitionist. On Law & Liberty.

Editors will love this list of five important typographical errors in history. One was on Abraham Lincoln’s monument; another was in a Bible, leading it to become known as the “Wicked Bible.” See History Facts.

Real Clear History provides two different views of what used to be called Columbus Day.

Christopher Columbus. Image from Pixabay.

“Columbus Day’s origins are much bloodier and more complicated than many realize,” writes C.W. Goodyear in the Washington Post.

Revisionists “have taken pains to denounce this event by exaggerating facts and creating others as they go along . . . while neglecting, suppressing or ignoring events which do not,” writes Miguel A. Faria from Hacienda Publishing.

The 18th-century polymath physician Benjamin Rush considered work as a cure for mental illness. Richard Gunderman discusses on Law & Liberty.

World War II led to changes in Americans’ everyday habits—from wearing T-shirts to taking a daily vitamin pill. Nicole Villeneuve compiles some of them on History Facts.

This month (October) marks the 250th anniversary of the “Edenton Tea Party.” Much like the Boston Tea Party, it was a rebellious act—and the colonies’ (and thus the nation’s) first known political action by women. I (Jane Shaw Stroup) write about it in the Carolina Journal.

Misguided Enlightenment ideas of progress lie behind the opposition to Israel by today’s progressives, says Richard Samuelson in Law & Liberty.

Victor Davis Hanson corrects the record about World War II. He is responding to the views of Darryl Cooper, a recent guest of Tucker Carlson on Carlson’s TCN show.

There was a brief blossoming of women literati in China in the 1920s and 1930s. Megan Yao describes what happened to it on humanprogress.com.

Did the decline of Christianity in the U.S. pave the way for socialism? Roger McGrath suggests that in an article in Chronicles.

If you like sports, you might like to learn how past U.S. presidents kept fit. Bennett Kleinman tells you about them in History Facts.

Why did the U.S. drop a second atom bomb? Sarah Pruitt of History.com explains the role it played in sending a message to Stalin. (The article is an updated version of a 2017 article.)

About 5,000 black soldiers from North Carolina served in the Union Army; one black regiment helped the Union take over Wilmington, the last remaining Confederate port. I (Jane Stroup) write about it in the Carolina Journal.

Is competition between the United States and China “eerily similar to the origins of World War I”? Ramon Bellin thinks so, writing in Law & Liberty.

Fifty Famous Assassinations

Leon Trotsky, Russian revolutionary.

In a reprise of an amazing past article, the BBC’s History Extra lists and discusses 50 assassinations that “resonated around the world.” (This image of Leon Trotsky is in the public domain. The Russian revolutionary, ousted by Stalin, was killed in exile in 1940.)

Current views about races have their roots in 17th-century concepts of “polygenism,” says Jacob Zellmer. He discusses the strange evolution of these ideas in Aeon.

Learn about major heat waves since 1858. Jennie Cohen describes the big ones in the U.S. and Europe.

Restrictive covenants are back: The Chicago school system is selling excess property but requiring the deed to include a statement that it won’t be used for a “K-12 charter school.” John F. Harnes discusses such covenants in his RealClearHistory article, “How Chicago Has Revived Its Legacy of Jim Crow.”

Yes, History and Fantasy Can Be Mixed

Mountain Folk, the first in John Hood’s series about the early United States.

On his blog, author John Hood discusses past examples of mixing history and folklore. He says doing so is
“nothing new.” He quotes a reviewer of Mountain Folk: “Sounds crazy — but it works!”

Why did Napoleon lose the Battle of Waterloo? To Graeme Callister, the surprise is how the brave but “makeshift” French army came as close to winning as it did. In War on the Rocks.

Lessons from the American Indian Experience

Image of Osage Indian woman and child, courtesy of DeGolyer Library, Southern Methodist University.

Paul Gottlieb considers the tragedy of the American natives and their cultures, and finds lessons for current American culture. On Chronicles.

History amateurs rediscover a long-lost Tudor palace in Collyweston, England, reports Megan Specia in the New York Times.

Egyptians were trailblazers in medicine, writes Jesse Greenspan in Inside History. Even the Greek poet Homer acknowledged their advances.

Yes, North Carolina has May 20, 1775, on its flag. But it may all be a big misunderstanding—even a hoax. I explain in the Carolina Journal.

In 1854, President Franklin Pierce vetoed the use of federal land to raise money for social welfare. A wise and courageous decision, says Lawrence Reed on the FEE website.

Related

One Reply to “A Way to Repair the Past”

Leave a ReplyCancel reply