Should Southern Military Bases Be Renamed?  

Braxton Bragg and Leonidas Polk have military bases  named after them, Fort Bragg in North Carolina and Fort Polk in Louisiana. 

Congress recently enacted (over President Trump’s veto) a defense funding law that calls for renaming military bases that honored Confederate generals.

Samuel R. Staley, writing for the Independent Institute, gives an intriguing argument in favor of the renaming.  His argument is not that Confederate generals were traitors, as some have claimed (and others have rejected). Rather, their names were used as a way of maintaining Jim Crow segregation. Continue reading “Should Southern Military Bases Be Renamed?  “

The 1920s Consensus on Prohibition . . . How Wilson Persecuted the Hutterites  . . . American Indian Warriors

Bootleggers

Perhaps history can teach us, after all. Here are some fascinating stories that surfaced in the past few weeks. My paragraphs will give you highlights and I encourage you to read the originals.

‘Follow the Consensus’

Looking back, most of us see the American prohibition era (1920–1933) as a giant, foolhardy mistake. It destroyed businesses, turned average citizens into criminals, built a mafia of corruption, and more. How could it have happened?

In an essay full of surprises, Jeffrey Tucker of AIER helps explain this mystery. It turns out that in the 1920s there was a powerful social consensus in favor of prohibition, promoted and backed by economists and physicians. To challenge it was unseemly at best. Continue reading “The 1920s Consensus on Prohibition . . . How Wilson Persecuted the Hutterites  . . . American Indian Warriors”

The Dark Ages Were Brighter Than You Think

Hadrian's Wall

This is a guest post by Jay Schalin, director of policy analysis for the James G. Martin Center for Academic Renewal in Raleigh. 

An oft-repeated phrase is that “history is written by the winners.” That’s not always true; sometimes, history is written by those who can write the best, even if they were the losers.

That seems to be the case with the historical period that many still call “The Dark Ages,” which supposedly began with the collapse of the Western Roman Empire around 400 AD and lasted until the 800s. The commonly accepted view is based largely on written accounts by Roman or Romanized observers who lamented the collapse of their civilization, according to Peter S. Wells, a University of Minnesota anthropologist, in his 2008 book Barbarians to Angels: The Dark Ages Reconsidered. The non-Roman European world that was in ascendance was largely pre-literate until the so-called Dark Ages were well under way. Continue reading “The Dark Ages Were Brighter Than You Think”

Our Native-American Vice President . . . a Black Slaveowner. . and the Election of 1876

Even though I’m not adding original posts right now, lively articles about history are all around us. Here are summaries of three, with links.

Charles Curtis: Republican, Native-American, and Vice President

Herbert Hoover’s vice president, Charles Curtis, was part-Native American, a member of the Kaw Tribe of Kansas. With Kamala Harris in the news, the Washington Post tells his interesting story (making the point that Harris will not be the first “person of color” to be an American vice president).

Curtis, whose mother was a Kaw member and whose father was white, grew up on the Kaw reservation in the late nineteenth century. As a teenager he moved sixty miles away to live with his paternal grandparents in Topeka, where he became something of a star horse jockey. When the tribe was forced to move to Oklahoma, Charles wanted to go, too, but his Kaw grandmother urged him to stay in Topeka and get an education. He did, and he was always grateful for her advice. He became an attorney and with his “winning personality,” a Kansas congressman, senator, and eventually vice president.

Here’s where the Post begins to go negative. Continue reading “Our Native-American Vice President . . . a Black Slaveowner. . and the Election of 1876”

Where Did the Workers Come From?

England before the Industrial Revolution

When I was in high school, I “knew” why the Industrial Revolution occurred in Great Britain.  Tenant farmers were forced off landlords’ estates by the British enclosure laws;  they moved into the cities and fueled the new factories. This seemed rather obvious (otherwise, where would the workers have come from?) and it was the conventional wisdom.

In 1928, for example, the celebrated historian Paul Mantoux had said, “Industry was in fact the only refuge for thousands of men who found themselves cut off from their traditional occupations. The manufactures were to offer them the living they could no longer earn on the land.” [1]

This conventional wisdom, however, was wrong. Continue reading “Where Did the Workers Come From?”